More about Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited
Fundamentals for Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited
Regulatory Filings for Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited
From Cost Center to Strategic Core: The Top 10 Trends Transforming Finance in 2026
CFOs Seize the Tech Purse Strings: How 2026 Budgets Are Fueling the AI Transformation
From Agentic AI to Tokenized Assets: The Fintech Trends Reshaping Financial Services
Forex Focus: How a Weakening Indian Rupee Could Reshape Markets in Q1 2026
Fundamentals for Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited
Business Operations:
Sector: Basic MaterialsIndustry: Agricultural Inputs
Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited manufactures and sells fertilizers and chemicals in India. The company operates in two segments, Fertilizer Products and Industrial Products. It offers fertilizers, including neem urea, di-ammonium phosphate, boronated NPK, ammonium phosphate sulphate, ammonium sulphate, APS, muriate of potash, gypsum, and micro mix. The company provides industrial products, such as v, nylon-6, anhydrous ammonia, cyclohexanone, sulphuric acid, technical grade urea, melamine, methyl ethyl ketoxime, hydroxylamine sulphate crystal, cyclohexane, argon gas, oleum, as well as methanol, nitric acid, ammonium sulphate, anone-anol mixture, melamine cyanurate, and potassium dihydrogen phosphate. In addition, the company offers water soluble fertilizers; sulphur based products; plant tissue culture products; micro nutrients; soil conditioners; organic products; and seeds. Further, it is involved in the provision of agro services; trading of agro input products; provision of port and logistics related services; and treatment and supply of waste water. The company was incorporated in 1962 and is based in Vadodara, India.
Revenue projections:
Investors may react cautiously to news that GSFC's revenues are forecasted to be lower than last year's. Such declines are likely to have a negative effect on the company's bottom line, which can lead to concerns about profitability and hinder investor confidence in the company's future performance.
Financial Ratios:
| currentRatio | 0.000000 |
|---|---|
| forwardPE | 10.298203 |
| debtToEquity | 0.011000 |
| earningsGrowth | 0.182000 |
| revenueGrowth | 0.045000 |
| grossMargins | 0.238300 |
| operatingMargins | 0.043280 |
| trailingEps | 17.390000 |
| forwardEps | 16.700000 |
GSFC's Forward PE is well-positioned, indicating the stock price is favorable compared to its earnings. This suggests the stock is not overpriced and offers room for growth, making it an attractive option for investors looking for future value appreciation.
GSFC's forward EPS being less than trailing EPS indicates the company's profitability is expected to decrease. This signals a potential downturn in financial performance compared to the previous year.
Price projections:
Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited's present price, in comparison to its projections, indicates no evident risks or opportunities. This balanced scenario suggests a steady environment, where investors might choose to wait for more definitive indicators before altering their strategies.
Recommendation changes over time:
Analysts have signaled a sell bias for Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited, but investors should consider a broad range of market indicators before making any decisions. This ensures a well-rounded understanding of Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited's position in the market and helps avoid reactionary moves based solely on this sentiment.
DISCLAIMER: We provide information and our musings based on events, but nothing on this site can be considered professional advice of any kind.
If you have enjoyed reading, spread the word:
Good prospects:
Companies with the best and the worst fundamentals.
Latest Regulatory Filings for NSE500
Companies with the best and the worst technicals.
Understanding Divergent House Price Movements Worldwide
The 2026 Tariff Tipping Point: When Trade Policy Reaches the Consumer
From Caracas to Commodities: The Market Impact of U.S.–China Friction